Copyright 2011-3011 By Chase Kyla Hunter, All Rights Reserved.
Author’s note: As much as Julian Assange may be reviled by those in high political places, his exposed Wikileaks diplomatic cables reveal something that causes more rewriting [again] of what we thought we knew to be true about the Iraq war. Numerous links are posted on these pages:
http://exposingliberallies.blogspot.com/2010/12/wikileaks-is-confirming-iraqs-wmd.html
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/10/24/wikileaks-documents-show-wmds-found-in-iraq/
These two posts purport that [ after everything, including ruined careers aplenty ] there was, in fact, WMD located in Iraq before the war, and that Russia removed part of it and the US removed other parts. The operative dilemma is what constitutes the actual definition of “WMD.” I am taking the position in the essay below that nuclear weapons of mass destruction is the defined term. Only the hidden files of the American Military Industrial complex contain the actual truth on the matter. Whatever was located by Russian and US forces, confiscated, squirreled away for future uses, we may never know.
So I am posting this note to let readers know there is still controversy over what was found, who found it, where it is, and how it may be used in the future.
I had written the essay below before I located the information above. I have now been exposed to so much contradictory information about “Iraqi WMD” that I don’t really know what to believe. But such is the reality of trying to report as a citizen journalist in the current American milleau of media spin, left wing disinformation, right wing counter-disinformation and all the rest.
It is truly maddening. I wanted to post the link to the information above, but I cannot verify it. Most of it comes from one blog, so buyer beware. Here’s an excerpt:
‘The release by Julian Assange’s web site Wikileaks of classified documents reveals that U.S. military intelligence discovered chemical weapons labs, encountered insurgents who were specialists in the creation of toxins, and uncovered weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. However, Washington, DC officials and the news media have ignored this information.
One of the WikiLeaks document dumps reveals that as late as 2008, American troops continued to find WMD in the region.
There are numerous mentions of chemical and biological weapons in the WikiLeaks documents, however the U.S. media appear only interested in those portions of the leaked material that highlight actions that are viewed as embarrassing for the U.S. military such as the accusation that U.S. commanders were aware of abuse and “torture” of prisoners by Iraqi soldiers and police officers.
The U.S. Defense Department continues to demand that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange immediately return the stolen military documents in his possession, including recent documents that created another stir when published, according to Elaine Wilson of American Forces Press Service.
The department also wants the whistle-blowing web site to permanently delete all versions of these documents, which contain classified and sensitive information, from its web site, computers and records, Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell told reporters during a Pentagon briefing.
WikiLeaks documents don’t reveal evidence of a massive weapons program by Saddam Hussein — the Bush administration’s leading rationale for invading Iraq — or some enormous stockpile of WMD, but do reveal that chemical weapons did vanish from the Iraqi battlefield.
According to the latest WikiLeaks document “dump,” Saddam’s toxic arsenal, significantly reduced after the Gulf War, remained intact. Jihadists, insurgents and foreign (possibly Iranian) agitators turned to these stockpiles during the Iraq conflict and may have brewed up their own deadly agents, according to the WikiLeaks web site.
During that time, former Iraqi General Georges Sada, Saddam’s top commander, detailed the transfers of Iraq’s WMD. “There [were] weapons of mass destruction gone out from Iraq to Syria, and they must be found and returned to safe hands,” Mr. Sada said. “I am confident they were taken over.”
Gen. Sada’s comments came just a month after Israel’s top general during Operation Iraqi Freedom, Moshe Yaalon, claimed that Saddam Hussein “transferred the chemical agents from Iraq to Syria.”
In 2004, for example, American special forces members secretly purchased what they believed to be containers of liquid sulfur mustard which have been used since World War I. Following testing in a military lab, the chemical was then secured and transferred to a secret location.’
[end excerpt]
Chase Kyla Hunter 02.04.2011
Below is my original essay from yesterday:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
The popular vote was turning out to be irrelevant after all, just like intelligent political observers had noted many years earlier. I continued to assume that the national electoral college was honest and ethical for the most part, because I hated considering the alternative. But it was a hard pill to swallow, seeing it all play out on national TV right before our eyes. Looking back I know now it had nothing to do with “hanging chads in Florida.” America was still in denial back then I suppose. We really did not want to believe that it was who you knew, who you paid off, who your daddy knew, and most importantly, what the Bilderbergers wanted, that dictated who would run the country. In 2000 many of us still thought our voices mattered and our presidential votes counted. We were naive and we just didn’t know better.
Then came 9-11 and the shock and grief of a nation stunned by an act of evil so monstrous we could barely comprehend it. Every American alive right now who was an adult when 9-11 occurred will always recall where they were and what they were doing when the event took place. It was an obelisk driven into the ground of our collective memory, a moment in time which marked the end of our political innocence and the beginning of our descent into the incomprehensible. A lone lady FBI agent working in a field office in the northern Midwest had seen this coming. She had warned her superiors about the probability and likelihood of a terrorist attack involving jihadists who would use American jetliners to fly into buildings. Her repeated field reports were disregarded. She was ignored. The attack took place. The Bilderberg plan proceeded. Not knowing the horrendous back end of the event at the time, after 9-11 a furious and desperate patriotism in America foamed at a fever pitch I had never witnessed before. Everywhere people who were usually politically aloof now flew American flags: on their car radio antennas, on their front porches, on t-shirts and jewelry, on houseboats, at rodeos, in shabby trailer parks and even in graffiti washed inner city ghettos. We had been told that Osama Bin Laden was the culprit, the mastermind of this attack, and we all wanted his head on a platter. Tell me, have you heard anyone in the press even mention Bin Laden’s name in the past few years? More oddly: have you ever heard Barack Obama mention the name “Osama Bin Laden?” The CIA knows all about the hidden truth on the Bin Laden story. They are holding the master dossier. And unless we burn them out with ever more scalding truth reports that “out” more of their horrendous secrets from the deep rabbit-hole of hidden black ops, they will never reveal what they know.
We were being told again and again about Saddam Hussein and his colossal stash of “weapons of mass destruction.” We all became familiar with the term “WMD.”
We were going to war in Iraq, all costs and consequences be damned.
It was all enough to make one lose the contents of their stomach, just observing what could only be described as Rumsfeld’s “military glee” with the deluge of death that we were raining down on Baghdad. The media bought the whole thing lock stock and barrel. That was the directive which had been given: “support the war effort, and constrain any dissent.”
The scripted Rumsfeld daily press conference which played out for about two years described above began to dissipate into national agony and outrage, as we all finally learned the terrible truth. There was no WMD stash hidden in Iraq that our soldiers could locate anywhere. Once again, the inconceivable was being delivered to us via those hated Big Media news heads that strained credulity to the breaking point. It became the most world famous “WTF moment” in modern times. We had gone to war over a CIA intelligence “mythology,” a fabrication which had been passed along via double-speaking double agents in the Mideast, like an old oral tradition, the original story changing and getting worse with each retelling, until the final version we heard on American Big Media newscasts bore no resemblance whatsoever to the original lie. It was now twenty times worse instead. Do you suppose Donald Rumsfeld secretly knew the truth all along? Do you suppose that the ruined credibility and dashed career of Colin Powell could have been averted? Or was Powell in on the “WMD terrible truth” too? Knowing what I now know about just how dark and sinister our American industrial military complex really is, I don’t know who or what to believe and I trust no history book any longer. I trust no written accounts of any person who worked in any political or media outlet administration, as almost every book written in this nation has some hidden ax to grind, some motive to advance, or some specific agenda to sell to the people. So, sad and pathetic as it is, and now nearly seven years late, the aging and greatly discredited Donald Rumsfeld is apparently attempting to clear his conscience and buy back a small morsel of his perceived place in history and his need for Americans’ respect by admitting in his new autobiography what we all well know, and have known for years: the three dreadful words that any American male in political public life almost never utters out of the sheer enormity of his ego: “I was wrong.” Rumsfeld is finally admitting that he was wrong about Iraq having WMD. Why should we care at this point? It seems so irrelevant now. I think about the thousands of good American men and women who have been killed, maimed, and the tens of thousands of children in America who will grow up without their mothers and fathers who died in the Iraq war. These families deserve better than Rumsfeld’s lame ass seven years late admission. His book only makes me more furious about the mountain of lies we have all been told. Once upon a time in the old American west the lynch mob took care of rotten-to-the-core men like Donald Rumsfeld who lusted for power and tried to rule young western American outposts crookedly by the “might is right” plan. But now, one hundred and fifty years later, we let our national disgraces retire to their ranches, their golf courses, their lobster, their banquet halls. We are politically correct to our eventual ruin. Had Rumsfeld admitted what he REALLY knew seven years ago, would it have made any difference? How long must the American people be forced to put up with such screaming hubris, sheer wickedness, corruption and incompetence in our political leaders? How many more people have to die in these NWO pre-planned and pre-packaged wars, designed by and for the gain of the Bilderberg ruling elites at the top of the Illuminati pyramid before we finally get some intelligent independent leadership in the White House, that’s not owned by the UN / CFR mandate?
When will the White House be returned to the American people and wrested from the Bilderberg usurpers who have ruined our country, escalated our national debt into the stratosphere, and lied to generations of Americans like me until I now have come to the culminating moment when I trust no man, no book, no news report, no talking head, and no current world event?
I want OUT of this psychotic “orchestrated American reality show” that we have all been forced to live in for 50 years or more, with most world events that we thought were the result of natural processes instead having been the product of hidden Bilderberg, CFR, CIA, NSA, and other machinating elitist orgs behind the scenes, pulling strings while pushing their cover stories down our throats. Modern television “programming” was basically invented to placate, distract and inebriate the national psyche while international actuality was pre-planned for us months and years in advance from behind the scenes. Where does it end? When will we have a President that is not a CIA bred Manchurian, who does not exist simply to carry out the Bilderberg, CFR and UN mandate, existing more or less as a “public relations hood ornament” to the globalist agenda of the ruling elites? At this point most Americans would be happy with any man or woman of any race or combination of races who has the sheer courage to stand up and face the ruling elites, decline their directives, run the country without them, and manage the cunning to stay alive and not be assassinated in so doing. John F. Kennedy was trying to “go public” about numerous hidden directives from the elites which he refused to comply with when he was assassinated. It’s not hard to do the math on that. It’s time to pour some cleansing Red Devil Lye down that CIA black ops rabbit-hole. It’s time to put an end to the Bilderberg group. God will show us how He wants this done. I maintain that there is a Divine Intervention afoot in this nation, and I believe devoutly that the Holy Spirit will lead the American people and show them how to proceed. How NOT to proceed is what we are all watching play out in Egypt. That is the typical testosterone solution and it will never be the answer. It’s past time to put a woman in the White House. It’s twenty years past time. Nothing is more feared on the planet than the righteous fury of a spiritually empowered woman who walks with the Holy Spirit and knows what she has to do. Nothing is more formidable than a woman in political power who walks with God, and inwardly knows it. If she walks with God, she won’t have to tell the nation. The nation will know. The Holy Spirit will make sure of it. Is she out there? Is she ready? Is she fully prepared for the hatred and rage will rise up against a woman President in this misogynist male dominated nation of bumbling fumbling aging fools who have now careened our country to the precipice of absolute financial and moral abyss? Is she ready to face all the NYC elitist patriarchal women of power, women who have become “female men,” women like Katie Couric, who will riddle her with queries designed to give her the educational and foreign policy litmus test that Sarah Palin so publicly failed? The calculated and fomented “hatred of Sarah Palin” that is part of the current directive for Big Media to deploy between now and 2012 has just about guaranteed that would-be supporters and voters will be just as hated as she is by the left. I experience this every time I open my mouth and say anything in support of Sarah Palin. But the divine equation stands: the more a woman in politics is hated and despised by the ruinous far left, the more likely she is to lead the nation in the spiritual, moral and financial right direction. Rumsfeld needs to take his “talking points” memoir, go home to his ranch, and never return to public life. His day in the Bilderberg sun is over. It’s time to prepare for REAL hope and change. It’s time to put an independent politically free, [ not a bought and paid for Muslim CIA Manchurian fraud ], into the White House, and it’s time to return the White House to her people. Where the men have failed, I believe the right woman, with the right wisdom, and the right comprehension of the task at hand, and the right determination and courage, can and will do this during her presidency, supported by the majority in this country who want out from under the UN’s thumb. I am waiting for her to step forward. I am waiting to see if she really has what it takes. If you are out there, will you please step forward? It’s time. Chase Kyla Hunter |
|
This essay was picked up and re-posted by the 2.4.11 release of The Blogs Daily on Twitter. |
Related Articles
- Rumsfeld, Still Defiant (thedailybeast.com)
- Rumsfeld largely unapologetic in memoir(seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Drudge Has Inside Scoop On Rumsfled Book. Explosive Details(alan.com)
- Rumsfeld Lashes Out (politicalwire.com)
- Donald Rumsfeld To Release Sexy Memoir, His Own Private Wikileaks [Books] (gawker.com)
- Rumsfeld writes of Iraq war origins (politico.com)
- Donald Rumsfeld reflects on writing of memoir (sfgate.com)
- Barry Eisler: Donald Rumsfeld, Defender of the Constitution (Really) (huffingtonpost.com)
- Donald Rumsfeld, Defender of the Constitution (Really)(my.firedoglake.com)
- Diane Sawyer To Interview Donald Rumsfeld In Former Defense Secretary’s First TV Interview Since 1996 (huffingtonpost.com)
- McSweeney’s Will Publish Rumsfeld Novel On Same Day As His Memoir (huffingtonpost.com)
- Rumsfeld writes of his Iraq role (politico.com)
- New Evidence of Rumsfeld’s Rush to War(swampland.blogs.time.com)
- Rumsfeld defends handling of Iraq war in new book (msnbc.msn.com)
- Rumsfeld, Still Defiant (thedailybeast.com)
- Donald Rumsfeld memoirs reveal no regrets over Iraq (guardian.co.uk)
- Donald Rumsfeld, you’re no Robert McNamara | Pratap Chatterjee (guardian.co.uk)
- Sean McBride: In Book, Donald Rumsfeld Recalls Bush’s Early Focus on Iraq – NYTimes.com (nytimes.com)
- Rumsfeld’s Book: No Regrets on Iraq (abcnews.go.com)
- Donald Rumsfeld: ‘I was wrong about Iraq’s WMDs’ in new autobiography (dailymail.co.uk)
- Rummy, in new book, defends Iraq war debacle (capitolhillblue.com)
- Rumsfeld remains largely unapologetic in memoir – Washington Post (news.google.com)
- You: Rumsfeld confesses he was wrong about WMDs in Iraq (nation.com.pk)
- Rumsfeld Memoir ‘Known And Unknown’ Reveals Doubts But Remains Self-Righteous (huffingtonpost.com)
- Rumsfeld’s Regrets: Not Many in New Memoir (swampland.blogs.time.com)
- Donald Rumsfeld was right about everything, book by Rumsfeld claims (salon.com)
- John McCain Counters Donald Rumsfeld: ‘Thank God He Was Relieved of His Duties’ (VIDEO) (huffingtonpost.com)
- Few regrets in ex-US defense chief’s memoir (alternet.org)
Related Articles
- Rumsfeld Memoir ‘Known And Unknown’ Reveals Doubts But Remains Self-Righteous (huffingtonpost.com)
- Rumsfeld’s Regrets: Not Many in New Memoir (swampland.blogs.time.com)
- Donald Rumsfeld was right about everything, book by Rumsfeld claims (salon.com)
- John McCain Counters Donald Rumsfeld: ‘Thank God He Was Relieved of His Duties’ (VIDEO) (huffingtonpost.com)
- Few regrets in ex-US defense chief’s memoir (alternet.org)
You Say You Want A Revolution? The Beatles, Live Performance
23 FebCopyright 2011-3011 By CK Hunter, All Rights Reserved.
“Revolution” by the Beatles, Lyrics:
You say you want a revolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
You tell me that it’s evolution
Well, you know
We all want to change the world
But when you talk about destruction
Don’t you know that you can count me out
Don’t you know it’s gonna be all right
all right, all right
You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We’d all love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well, you know
We’re doing what we can
But when you want money
for people with minds that hate
All I can tell is brother you have to wait
Don’t you know it’s gonna be all right
all right, all right
Ah
ah, ah, ah, ah, ah…
You say you’ll change the constitution
Well, you know
We all want to change your head
You tell me it’s the institution
Well, you know
You better free you mind instead
But if you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao
You ain’t going to make it with anyone anyhow
Don’t you know it’s gonna be all right
all right, all right
all right, all right, all right
all right, all right, all right
If you love it, share it! Thanks.
Like this:
Tags: Live performances The Beatles, Revolution, the Beatles, You Say You Want A Revolution?