Tag Archives: Julian Assange

Donald Rumsfeld’s Problematic Memoir: WMD “Lost and Found” Question Still at Large

4 Feb
rumsfeld [unknown unknowns]

Donald Rumsfeld

Copyright 2011-3011 By Chase Kyla Hunter, All Rights Reserved.

Author’s note: As much as Julian Assange may be reviled by those in high political places, his exposed Wikileaks diplomatic cables reveal something that causes more rewriting [again] of what we thought we knew to be true about the Iraq war. Numerous links are posted on these pages:

http://exposingliberallies.blogspot.com/2010/12/wikileaks-is-confirming-iraqs-wmd.html

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/10/24/wikileaks-documents-show-wmds-found-in-iraq/

These two posts purport that [ after everything, including ruined careers aplenty ] there was, in fact, WMD located in Iraq before the war, and that Russia removed part of it and the US removed other parts.  The operative dilemma is what constitutes the actual definition of “WMD.” I am taking the position in the essay below that nuclear weapons of mass destruction is the defined term. Only the hidden files of the American Military Industrial complex contain the actual truth on the matter. Whatever was located by Russian and US forces, confiscated, squirreled away for future uses, we may never know.

So I am posting this note to let readers know there is still controversy over what was found, who found it, where it is, and how it may be used in the future.

I had written the essay below before I located the information above. I have now been exposed to so much contradictory information about “Iraqi WMD” that I don’t really know what to believe. But such is the reality of trying to report as a citizen journalist in the current American milleau of media spin, left wing disinformation, right wing counter-disinformation and all the rest.

It is truly maddening. I wanted to post the link to the information above, but I cannot verify it. Most of it comes from one blog, so buyer beware. Here’s an excerpt:

‘The release by Julian Assange’s web site Wikileaks of classified documents reveals that U.S. military intelligence discovered chemical weapons labs, encountered insurgents who were specialists in the creation of toxins, and uncovered weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. However, Washington, DC officials and the news media have ignored this information.

One of the WikiLeaks document dumps reveals that as late as 2008, American troops continued to find WMD in the region.

There are numerous mentions of chemical and biological weapons in the WikiLeaks documents, however the U.S. media appear only interested in those portions of the leaked material that highlight actions that are viewed as embarrassing for the U.S. military such as the accusation that U.S. commanders were aware of abuse and “torture” of prisoners by Iraqi soldiers and police officers.

The U.S. Defense Department continues to demand that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange immediately return the stolen military documents in his possession, including recent documents that created another stir when published, according to Elaine Wilson of American Forces Press Service.

The department also wants the whistle-blowing web site to permanently delete all versions of these documents, which contain classified and sensitive information, from its web site, computers and records, Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell told reporters during a Pentagon briefing.

WikiLeaks documents don’t reveal evidence of a massive weapons program by Saddam Hussein — the Bush administration’s leading rationale for invading Iraq — or some enormous stockpile of WMD, but do reveal that chemical weapons did vanish from the Iraqi battlefield.

According to the latest WikiLeaks document “dump,” Saddam’s toxic arsenal, significantly reduced after the Gulf War, remained intact. Jihadists, insurgents and foreign (possibly Iranian) agitators turned to these stockpiles during the Iraq conflict and may have brewed up their own deadly agents, according to the WikiLeaks web site.

During that time, former Iraqi General Georges Sada, Saddam’s top commander, detailed the transfers of Iraq’s WMD. “There [were] weapons of mass destruction gone out from Iraq to Syria, and they must be found and returned to safe hands,” Mr. Sada said. “I am confident they were taken over.”

Gen. Sada’s comments came just a month after Israel’s top general during Operation Iraqi Freedom, Moshe Yaalon, claimed that Saddam Hussein “transferred the chemical agents from Iraq to Syria.”

In 2004, for example, American special forces members secretly purchased what they believed to be containers of liquid sulfur mustard which have been used since World War I. Following testing in a military lab, the chemical was then secured and transferred to a secret location.’

[end excerpt]

Chase Kyla Hunter 02.04.2011

Below is my original essay from yesterday:


I always knew that the only man more arrogant than Dick Cheney in the George W. Bush White House was Donald Rumsfeld.I had grown tired of watching geriatric old white men try to run the country at least 20 years earlier when George’s father was in the White House, running up the national debt to near crisis levels back then. It took Ross Perot to remind us all about that, with his charts and graphs and funny ears.Then came the high IQ southern rooster, Bill Clinton, another Bilderberg man all the way, brainy, but a poor excuse for a national leader on moral, marital and ethical terms.Clinton played the saxophone on late night TV to get the youth vote. He was a flagrant womanizer, and no amount of public relations media sheen would be able to eventually obfuscate that fact. His wife seemed to be a lot smarter than he was, but she had chronic “bad hair” and Americans took deep umbrage at her crack about “not staying home and making cookies” during Bill’s presidency. Hillary too, seemed doomed by her behaviors and commentary to become a tolerated political thorn in the nation’s side.

By the time we got to George Junior, via his crooked relatives in Florida and his old boy’s club cronies who sat on the Supreme Court, I was already so disgusted with the sad sorry affair of what we are offered as an excuse for presidential leadership in this country, that I was mostly tuning it all out. I was historically apolitical, found it all distasteful and routinely dishonest and for the most part could have cared less. I watched sadly as Al Gore went home and accepted the fact that his election night win and his presidency had been stolen from him.

The popular vote was turning out to be irrelevant after all, just like intelligent political observers had noted many years earlier.

I continued to assume that the national electoral college was honest and ethical for the most part, because I hated considering the alternative.

But it was a hard pill to swallow, seeing it all play out on national TV right before our eyes. Looking back I know now it had nothing to do with “hanging chads in Florida.” America was still in denial back then I suppose. We really did not want to believe that it was who you knew, who you paid off, who your daddy knew, and most importantly, what the Bilderbergers wanted, that dictated who would run the country.

In 2000 many of us still thought our voices mattered and our presidential votes counted. We were naive and we just didn’t know better.

Right after George Junior took office he began to plan the Iraq war. As Michael Moore noted in “Fahrenheit 9-11” the younger Bush enjoyed golf, and he played frequently. He was playing lots and lots of golf in the weeks and months right before 9-11 took place. He took fishing trips. He played cowboy on his Texas ranch.

Then came 9-11 and the shock and grief of a nation stunned by an act of evil so monstrous we could barely comprehend it. Every American alive right now who was an adult when 9-11 occurred will always recall where they were and what they were doing when the event took place. It was an obelisk driven into the ground of our collective memory, a moment in time which marked the end of our political innocence and the beginning of our descent into the incomprehensible.

A lone lady FBI agent working in a field office in the northern Midwest had seen this coming. She had warned her superiors about the probability and likelihood of a terrorist attack involving jihadists who would use American jetliners to fly into buildings. Her repeated field reports were disregarded. She was ignored. The attack took place. The Bilderberg plan proceeded.

Not knowing the horrendous back end of the event at the time, after 9-11 a furious and desperate patriotism in America foamed at a fever pitch I had never witnessed before.

Everywhere people who were usually politically aloof now flew American flags: on their car radio antennas, on their front porches, on t-shirts and jewelry, on houseboats, at rodeos, in shabby trailer parks and even in graffiti washed inner city ghettos. We had been told that Osama Bin Laden was the culprit, the mastermind of this attack, and we all wanted his head on a platter.

Tell me, have you heard anyone in the press even mention Bin Laden’s name in the past few years? More oddly: have you ever heard Barack Obama mention the name “Osama Bin Laden?”

The CIA knows all about the hidden truth on the Bin Laden story. They are holding the master dossier. And unless we burn them out with ever more scalding truth reports that “out” more of their horrendous secrets from the deep rabbit-hole of hidden black ops, they will never reveal what they know.

By late 2001, post 9-11, western style wanted posters of Bin Laden were appearing on hundreds of websites. Open plans for the war on Iraq were discussed and debated on Big Media news outlets.

We were being told again and again about Saddam Hussein and his colossal stash of “weapons of mass destruction.” We all became familiar with the term “WMD.”

One of our favorite American sons at the time, Colin Powell, who was a trusted political figure before the Iraq war, went before the UN and made his case for war. In spite of the dissent and debate which roared over it, the decision had been made in secret, years prior, without our knowledge, without our consent, as usual. The decision had most likely been made before George junior was artificially appointed President, in hidden halls of power that Alex Jones has now made very familiar to everyone with his ranting mega horn blaring, screaming patriotic platitudes at the passing black limousines that swoosh by as they enter some secret destination somewhere for the annual Halloween Witches and Warlocks political carnival that is commonly referred to as the “Annual Secret Bilderberg Meeting.”

We were going to war in Iraq, all costs and consequences be damned.

I distinctly recall those heady moments for Donald Rumsfeld during the early opening moments of theIraq war, during the “shock and awe” phase, when he would strut into the daily national White House press conference and hold court before bewildered and submissive reporters who were trying to understand what was really taking place.

Rumsfeld glowed. He conducted himself like the happiest man in the universe. By God he was at last having his war his way, the war which had been planned for so long, the war which was on the Bilderberg blueprint for America far in advance of 9-11. And now by God he was in charge of it all, having a grand time appearing daily before American TV cameras as the public relations centerpiece of the whole operation. Rumsfeld would strut into those press conferences during the first 90 days of “shock and awe” like the President himself. He could not have been more proud of what was taking place.

It was all enough to make one lose the contents of their stomach, just observing what could only be described as Rumsfeld’s “military glee” with the deluge of death that we were raining down on Baghdad. The media bought the whole thing lock stock and barrel. That was the directive which had been given: “support the war effort, and constrain any dissent.”

Rumsfeld would be questioned with hushed tones of reverence and respect back then, young reporters perspiring to choose their words just right so as not to offend the great military warrior king who was in charge of ridding the world of Iraq’s dreaded “weapons of mass destruction.” For a fleeting moment in American history, Donald Rumsfeld was the most important man in America. Invigorated by all the press and attention, his step had a little extra spring in it when he walked toward the podium to address the press about the progress of our military machine as it pummeled Baghdad.

What a different story history will finally write. Americans are not nearly as uninformed as they were ten years ago about who and what really runs the country and what they have done.

The scripted Rumsfeld daily press conference which played out for about two years described above began to dissipate into national agony and outrage, as we all finally learned the terrible truth. There was no WMD stash hidden in Iraq that our soldiers could locate anywhere. Once again, the inconceivable was being delivered to us via those hated Big Media news heads that strained credulity to the breaking point. It became the most world famous “WTF moment” in modern times.


We had gone to war over a CIA intelligence “mythology,” a fabrication which had been passed along via double-speaking double agents in the Mideast, like an old oral tradition, the original story changing and getting worse with each retelling, until the final version we heard on American Big Media newscasts bore no resemblance whatsoever to the original lie. It was now twenty times worse instead.

Do you suppose Donald Rumsfeld secretly knew the truth all along? Do you suppose that the ruined credibility and dashed career of Colin Powell could have been averted? Or was Powell in on the “WMD terrible truth”  too?

Knowing what I now know about just how dark and sinister our American industrial military complex really is, I don’t know who or what to believe and I trust no history book any longer. I trust no written accounts of any person who worked in any political or media outlet administration, as almost every book written in this nation has some hidden ax to grind, some motive to advance, or some specific agenda to sell to the people.

So, sad and pathetic as it is, and now nearly seven years late, the aging and greatly discredited Donald Rumsfeld is apparently attempting to clear his conscience and buy back a small morsel of his perceived place in history and his need for Americans’ respect by admitting in his new autobiography what we all well know, and have known for years: the three dreadful words that any American male in political public life almost never utters out of the sheer enormity of his ego: “I was wrong.”

Rumsfeld is finally admitting that he was wrong about Iraq having WMD. Why should we care at this point? It seems so irrelevant now. I think about the thousands of good American men and women who have been killed, maimed, and the tens of thousands of children in America who will grow up without their mothers and fathers who died in the Iraq war. These families deserve better than Rumsfeld’s lame ass seven years late admission. His book only makes me more furious about the mountain of lies we have all been told.

Once upon a time in the old American west the lynch mob took care of rotten-to-the-core men like Donald Rumsfeld who lusted for power and tried to rule young western American outposts crookedly by the “might is right” plan. But now, one hundred and fifty years later, we let our national disgraces retire to their ranches, their golf courses, their lobster, their banquet halls.  We are politically correct to our eventual ruin.

Had Rumsfeld admitted what he REALLY knew seven years ago, would it have made any difference? How long must the American people be forced to put up with such screaming hubris, sheer wickedness, corruption and incompetence in our political leaders?

How many more people have to die in these NWO pre-planned and pre-packaged wars, designed by and for the gain of the Bilderberg ruling elites at the top of the Illuminati pyramid before we finally get some intelligent independent leadership in the White House, that’s not owned by the UN / CFR mandate?

Beginning just a few months back, at the end of 2010, the opinion and commentary of the CFR is now openly broadcast on NBC Evening News, on radio newscasts and in the press, with little public outcry. The brainwashing of the unawakened American sheeple is just about complete. As events line up for World War III they will march more tens of thousands of US soldiers to their graves for the profit of the Illuminati clan at the top of the Freemason pyramid, unless the American people say “No more. We will not fight your Illuminati ‘designer wars’ any longer.”

When will the White House be returned to the American people and wrested from the Bilderberg usurpers who have ruined our country, escalated our national debt into the stratosphere, and lied to generations of Americans like me until I now have come to the culminating moment when I trust no man, no book, no news report, no talking head, and no current world event?

I now know EXACTLY how the character “Truman” in the film “The Truman Show” felt as he sailed his little boat to the edge of his fake make-believe world, and crashed it into the “edge of the sky” where the dome’s floor met the sea line. I know exactly how he felt as he groped his way along the seam, looking for an exit, trying to find the door.

I want OUT of this psychotic “orchestrated American reality show” that we have all been forced to live in for 50 years or more, with most world events that we thought were the result of natural processes instead having been the product of hidden Bilderberg, CFR, CIA, NSA, and other machinating elitist orgs behind the scenes, pulling strings while pushing their cover stories down our throats. Modern television “programming” was basically invented to placate, distract and inebriate the national psyche while international actuality was pre-planned for us months and years in advance from behind the scenes. Where does it end?

When will we have a President that is not a CIA bred Manchurian, who does not exist simply to carry out the Bilderberg, CFR and UN mandate, existing more or less as a “public relations hood ornament” to the globalist agenda of the ruling elites?

At this point most Americans would be happy with any man or woman of any race or combination of races who has the sheer courage to stand up and face the ruling elites, decline their directives, run the country without them, and manage the cunning to stay alive and not be assassinated in so doing. John F. Kennedy was trying to “go public” about numerous hidden directives from the elites which he refused to comply with when he was assassinated. It’s not hard to do the math on that.

It’s time to pour some cleansing Red Devil Lye down that CIA black ops rabbit-hole. It’s time to put an end to the Bilderberg group. God will show us how He wants this done. I maintain that there is a Divine Intervention afoot in this nation, and I believe devoutly that the Holy Spirit will lead the American people and show them how to proceed. How NOT to proceed is what we are all watching play out in Egypt. That is the typical testosterone solution and it will never be the answer.

It’s past time to put a woman in the White House. It’s twenty years past time. Nothing is more feared on the planet than the righteous fury of a spiritually empowered woman who walks with the Holy Spirit and knows what she has to do. Nothing is more formidable than a woman in political power who walks with God, and inwardly knows it. If she walks with God, she won’t have to tell the nation. The nation will know. The Holy Spirit will make sure of it.

Is she out there? Is she ready? Is she fully prepared for the hatred and rage will rise up against a woman President in this misogynist male dominated nation of bumbling fumbling aging fools who have now careened our country to the precipice of absolute financial and moral abyss? Is she ready to face all the NYC elitist patriarchal women of power, women who have become “female men,” women like Katie Couric, who will riddle her with queries designed to give her the educational and foreign policy litmus test that Sarah Palin so publicly failed?

The calculated and fomented “hatred of Sarah Palin” that is part of the current directive for Big Media to deploy between now and 2012 has just about guaranteed that would-be supporters and voters will be just as hated as she is by the left. I experience this every time I open my mouth and say anything in support of Sarah Palin.

But the divine equation stands: the more a woman in politics is hated and despised by the ruinous far left, the more likely she is to lead the nation in the spiritual, moral and financial right direction. Rumsfeld needs to take his “talking points” memoir, go home to his ranch, and never return to public life. His day in the Bilderberg sun is over. It’s time to prepare for REAL hope and change. It’s time to put an independent politically free, [ not a bought and paid for Muslim CIA Manchurian fraud ], into the White House, and it’s time to return the White House to her people.

Where the men have failed, I believe the right woman, with the right wisdom, and the right comprehension of the task at hand, and the right determination and courage, can and will do this during her presidency, supported by the majority in this country who want out from under the UN’s thumb. I am waiting for her to step forward. I am waiting to see if she really has what it takes. If you are out there, will you please step forward? It’s time.

Chase Kyla Hunter

This essay was picked up and re-posted by the 2.4.11 release of The Blogs Daily on Twitter.

Related Articles

Advertisements

Revenge of the Wikileaks Nerds: Former Staffer to Launch Rival Site “Openleaks”

10 Dec

Copyright 12.10.2010 by Chase Kyla Hunter, re-posts permitted leaving authorship, content and links intact.

Well you knew with the worldwide fame, uproar and incredible celebrity that Julian Assange has accrued from creating Wikileaks, it would most likely happen. A former staffer for Wikileaks will soon create a “Wikileaks knock-off”, Openleaks. It seems there is just no loyalty in the world of spilling dark state secrets into the laptops and living rooms of those curious to know. I’m quite sure that Openleaks creator Daniel Domscheit-Berg is now destined to become one of the most hated men in the online world. Traitor! How many other Wikileak staffers will now follow Daniel’s lead, and also jump ship to swim into their own personal dreams of internet counterculture fame and fortune? Might we soon have dozens of mirror sites cloning the original all over the web, such that the original becomes practically irrelevant, just a historical footnote marking where the internet’s “LEAK” movement began? I’m not so sure that imitation is really the highest form of flattery. Having had something similar to this done to me about, oh, 20 or 30 times in my internet career, when I launched a site, a concept, coined a turn of phrase, connected a specific set of dots, only to find my own work posted on someone else’s website a few days or weeks later, I don’t take too kindly to knock-offs, creativity crooks, and cheap imitations of the original.

No one wants to actually get caught carrying a fake Gucci handbag. But I usually have to confront someone online who has stolen posts off my site, and re-posted them as their own material with no author’s credit, no link back etcetera, at least once a week. “Take down that post, or credit me as the author, you’re busted!” Even though Assange is sitting in a jail cell. and may not be aware of his staffer’s “new internet career” imitating Wikileaks, I’m sure he will be furious when he finds out.

“Stop! Thief! Oh… it’s just those 250,000 US diplomatic cables that I actually stole myself. What the heck? Take ’em. You see where exposing those cables got me lad? They landed me in the slammer. Go ahead, publish to your heart’s content. “

No one really likes or respects a traitor, whether you originally supported what Julian Assange was doing or not. Noting the headline of another article about this event: “The Internet Cannot Be Stopped, Wikileaks defectors About to Launch Openleaks”,

Please, for the love of Emperor Julian, if nothing else…. take off that high and mighty “internet hero” cape you’re wearing, and admit it. You just want to be internet rich, media famous, and get laid by some Hollywood starlet. This all feels like a really lousy episode of the web’s new version of “Entourage.”

Isn’t this all much more about the quest for web notoriety and personal fame than it is about championing the “internet’s new cause” of releasing taboo FED secrets and state cables? Please fellows, stop pretending to take the high road. Umm, excuse me, your motives are showing. You all just want what you perceive Julian Assange to have: global fame and celebrity, not to mention the millions that will pour in from supporters. How utterly shameless can a group of radical activist web geeks get?

I’m coining a new term to describe Daniel Domscheit-Berg and his actions: internet web portal “identity thief”, aka copycat “sludge monger”.

Chase Kyla Hunter

Related:

Wikileaks Staffers Defect from “Emperor Assange”, Launch OPENLEAKS

John Bolton Essay Indicts Obama Presidency on National Security

10 Dec

Copyright 12.10.2010 By Chase Kyla Hunter

The piece below by John Bolton actually stopped me in my tracks. It’s funny how another writer’s observations will often help to coalesce one’s own discomfort with a situation.  I have taken an unpopular position for an internet pro and citizen journalist blogger regarding Wikileaks, in that I feel what Julian Assange did was both narcissistic, shortsighted and reckless.

The ends do not justify his means and actions in my opinion. I am well aware that thousands of other “truthers” do not feel this way, but when it comes right down to genetic patriotism, the Cherokee Warrior Queen and American patriot in me trumps the internet blogger who was mildly intrigued by absolute unfettered free spewing of  ” FED diplomatic cables”. As a truth researcher of 20 years experience, finding ugly little piles of lies buried somewhere under a false flag event is just another day’s work. Why should the content of those cables be anything that would even surprise someone like me? It’s just another day in the life… I haven’t much bothered to study them.

For me, the bottom line is this:  I don’t want to see my country hurt and humiliated any more than it has been to date in this charade of a presidency with Obama as the hood ornament. There is a huge part of me that is standing aside and watching this melee who doesn’t buy the story as it’s being told anyway. Our government “allows” certain things to take place for their own good reasons. Look at what the FED is gaining in all this: perfect justification to crack down like never before on internet free speech, the free and relatively private process of registering and administering a domain name, I could cite dozens more benefits for a fascist leaning FED that is salivating to take over the web and run it with the efficiency of Obama’s socialized medicine. I can almost hear the elites rubbing their hands together in glee in Washington, NYC, UK while they watch these “cyber-riots” spreading over the web. It’s most likely exactly what they wanted all along, and they will use these events as more pretext to strip away civil liberties online when the dust settles.

Further, my political science mind clearly knows that what Assange did in releasing those cables has imperiled the American nation. That is MY nation, MY America, MY American friends and neighbors, and after all, Assange really has no clue about who and what America is if he did not grow up here on the mainland, native born. We all have before us daily the peculiar new world odor of our own President’s utter lack of interest in defending American interests, religious heritage, or national security in a sudden event like Wikileaks latest disclosures. They should have seen this coming. It was not as if we were not warned by Assange’s earlier actions. But John Bolton points out that funny uncomfortable, “who’s in charge?” feeling, that sense of navigational drift that now emanates from the Obama presidency.

It was as if in reading his piece, my subconscious fixed finally on the point of “Oh, so I am not the only person who feels very uncomfortable with how this Wikileaks / Assange mess is all being so adroitly NON-handled” by the White House.”

When you choose to go white water rafting with a group of strangers, you look around rather nervously to see who will be sitting at the lead point in the raft, calling out the instructions for how to keep the thing afloat and above water all the way down. Barack Obama stopped calling out those instructions to the nation a long time ago, in fact, it occurs he never did take the safety first defensive position for our country. It’s just a very deep gut feeling I have that his inner contempt for America and true American values is now really starting to spill over into all kinds of decision making moments when the moment comes, and goes, and no decision is the action taken. It’s surreal politically, and strategically rather self loathing, perhaps even self destructive.

I’ll just be honest. I want his presidency to end, and sooner rather than later. Barack Obama’s style of empty looking glass leadership is really hurting America. Everyone everywhere who is awake at the helm can feel it. And John Bolton [not that I am particularly a fan, he’s in the UN globalist fan club from way back ] just gave voice to some of my deepest worries and concerns. Thanks John. Oddly, I don’t feel much better now.

Chase Kyla Hunter, the Witness

Article reference:

John Bolton: “Barack Obama is a bigger danger than WikiLeaks”

Also Noteworthy from the WSJ:

We have not in our lifetimes seen a president in this position. He spent his first year losing the center, which elected him, and his second losing his base, which is supposed to provide his troops. There isn’t much left to lose! Which may explain Tuesday’s press conference.

On the Same Day Assange is Arrested, FED Announces D.C. Will Host UN’s “World Press Freedom Day” in 2011

8 Dec
South façade of the White House, the executive...

Image via Wikipedia

Copyright 12.07.2010 By Chase Kyla Hunter, All Rights Reserved, Re-posts permitted leaving content and sources, links intact.

Well folks you just can’t make this stuff up. As everyone now knows Julian Assange was arrested in London this morning and is being held without bail. Reactions have ranged from “he is a lucky martyr and this will just help his cause” to “he should be executed” . I won’t bore the reader with too many lists of videos and news links but I do want you to examine the story below, and then have a gander at the Facebook page for “World Press Freedom Day 2011″ , then tell me if their logo does not look just exactly like a typographical version of a Nazi swastika? I’m a retired graphics professional and it’s the very first thing I noticed when I saw the page load. To heck with anything subliminal, this was overt.

Here’s the link to the “World Press Freedom Day 2011” Facebook page.

Here are my thoughts:

1) You could not get me to attend this thing even if you were giving away free laptops, PDAs, cars and “press passes for life” – it will never happen.

2) It occurred to me as I was reading their press release that if the UN wanted to be able to “tag” and ID every person who was / is a writer, journalist, citizen journalist, reporter, blogger, etc in one smooth movement, what and how could they do this? Of course! They could host a grand globalist press party and hold it in Washington D.C., which is the grande olde “Illuminati headquarters east coast,” then invite every press, media person, and wanna-be journalist on the planet to come to their “press freedom day party.” All attendees would be surreptitiously videotaped, IDed and database flagged,  every person who shows up is now on their list and in their official database.

“The better to watch over you my dear…”

3) I will wager that all attendees will be asked to fill out some sort of paperwork and will be issued “official” World UN press passes that are RFID enabled, and voila – there you have it, in one fell swoop, you have datamined all who might possibly dissent from UN policies in the future, and you have them stupidly carrying around their coveted RFID enabled “world UN press passes” so that you can follow their every move. Anyone in betting mood? I will take bets this is what they have in mind here by throwing this  event.

4) Regarding the upcoming 2011 event, there is undoubtedly a grand UN / CFR “wining and dining” process going on for the hearts, souls, allegiance and minds of American and world youth. I see it everywhere. When CFR President Richard Haas had a big public press conference with Google founders in 2008 I knew what the agenda was really all about. Look how utterly cool the President of the CFR must be… up there hob-knobing with the coolest men on the planet, the executives and founders of Google: [blah, blah, blah]

CFR’s Meeting with Eric Schmidt, Jared Cohen, and Richard N. Haass on “The Digital Disruption”

5) I see the “world press freedom day 2011” event as just one more in a string of high profile globalist public events designed to woo and lure in the worldwide community of press, media and journalists who are still “not really on board yet” regarding US national sovereignty being ever so tacitly gradually usurped by the Council on Foreign Relations and the UN. People if you don’t pay attention at every turn they will slip another action, event, or other piece of orchestrated gradualism into the American mainstream, making it all seem so normal and natural, that we won’t know how it all finally happened when we wake up one morning and realize that there is NO United States of America left. We are now just another bloc in the emerging North American Union. Do your own research on this upcoming 2011 event and beware the motives behind it.

Chase Kyla Hunter


U.S. to Host World Press Freedom Day in 2011

Press Statement

Philip J. Crowley
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Public Affairs
December 7, 2010

The United States is pleased to announce that it will host UNESCO’s World Press Freedom Day event in 2011, from May 1 – May 3 in Washington, D.C. UNESCO is the only UN agency with the mandate to promote freedom of expression and its corollary, freedom of the press.

The theme for next year’s commemoration will be 21st Century Media: New Frontiers, New Barriers. The United States places technology and innovation at the forefront of its diplomatic and development efforts. New media has empowered citizens around the world to report on their circumstances, express opinions on world events, and exchange information in environments sometimes hostile to such exercises of individuals’ right to freedom of expression. At the same time, we are concerned about the determination of some governments to censor and silence individuals, and to restrict the free flow of information. We mark events such as World Press Freedom Day in the context of our enduring commitment to support and expand press freedom and the free flow of information in this digital age.

Highlighting the many events surrounding the celebration will be the awarding of the UNESCO Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize at the National Press Club on May 3rd. This prize, determined by an independent jury of international journalists, honors a person, organization or institution that has notably contributed to the defense and/or promotion of press freedom, especially where risks have been undertaken.

The Newseum will host the first two days of events, which will engage a broad array of media professionals, students, and citizen reporters on themes that address the status of new media and internet freedom, and challenges and opportunities faced by media in our rapidly changing world.

The State Department looks forward to working with UNESCO and the U.S. executive committee spearheaded by the Center for International Media Assistance at the National Endowment for Democracy, IREX, and the United Nations Foundation and the many civil society organizations they have brought together in support of the organization of events unfolding in Washington.

For further information regarding World Press Freedom Day Events for program content, please visit the World Press Freedom Facebook page http://www.connect.connect.facebook.com/WPFD2011

PRN: 2010/1763

Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange Arrested in London

8 Dec

12.07.2010 Youtube videos re-posted by CK Hunter

Tags: Julian Assange, Wikileaks, Assange Arrest London

 

Related Tweets from Altnewsforum on Twitter:

CK Hunter
Altnewsforum CK Hunter
Julian Assange Under Arrest: http://soc.li/izbBCeP
CK Hunter
Altnewsforum CK Hunter
Will WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange, now arrested, take the ‘nuclear’ option? – CSMonitor.com csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2… via @AddThis
»
CK Hunter
Altnewsforum CK Hunter

Moveon.org Wants The ‘Old’ Obama of 2008 to Return

1 Dec

11.29.2010 By Chase Kyla Hunter

Since the Wikileaks cables release, I have been perusing new research and  re-tracing the many myriad orgs, institutes, think tanks, and other aggregates which have either been founded or funded by George Soros. Glenn Beck has laid out some pretty peculiar connected dots between George Soros and Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, and as of this morning, arguably the most despised, yet well known name on planet earth.

Ecuador has volunteered to give Julian Assange permanent safe harbor from the potential legal troubles he may soon encounter for stealing and releasing hundreds of thousands of US diplomatic cables and posting them to the web via wikileaks.org. Beck maintains that George Soros is financing Julian, which he states might equate to George Soros having the USA in his sights as a target. Along the trail of re-visiting some of Soros’s orgs, I found something I thought to be quite humorous, in a sad sort of way.

It’s a video clip where one of Barack Obama’s young supporters is begging for the “Old” Barack Obama of 2008 to come back,  put on his cape and begin fighting the worldwide evil threat presented by conservatism again, or something like that. Oh, Superman. Oh duh.

I wonder which Obama he really longs for, as there are at least three or four Obamas that I have noted in his NPD mood swings. Let’s see, well we all know “Messiah Obama” – the ONE, the anointed, the great [muslim ] Czar president of the world, then there is “brown shirt” Obama, the one who wants Americans to sit down, shut up, accept socialized healthcare, and stop trying to keep the America they have known and loved since their baby boomer youth. There is spendaholic Obama, who sees every problem in terms of how much electronic printing press money he can throw at it, to keep bailing us out of this, that, and the next sinking financial boat.

And finally the newest Obama is the brooding [ and quick to run away to India ] “shellacked” Obama, the actual man behind the “Wizard of Odd” curtain, the one we now realize was actually telling the truth in 2005 when he earnestly spoke with reporters about how a presidential run in 08 was out of the question, as he knew he did not have enough experience to be the president.

Ahhh. There we have it. There’s our man. He is the one that really lives behind all the other Obamas. He is a liberal intellectual, far left leaning college professor, an academic who was ‘handled’ since his youth by secret government nwo men in suits, has never owned or operated a business, never has actually lived in the real world of finance, usually only voted “present” as a neophyte senator in 05 and 06, is mostly tolerant of Christian beliefs, but only because he knows he must be, is disgusted secretly by America’s historical position in the world, and now is apparently determined to change it. That’s the actual real Obama that I have identified thus far.

And now that he has been thoroughly shellacked by American voters, we all continue to pray, to wait and watch to see which way he will move next on his agenda: the “dismantling of American excellence by degrees” NWO mandate that he apparently operates under. Here are two videos:

Chase Kyla Hunter

http://pol.moveon.org/obamavideo/

Historical videos:

Hillary Clinton: Secretary of State, Super Sleuth, Super Furious Over Wikileaks

30 Nov

Copyright 11.29.2010 By CK Hunter, Re-post courtesy of the Daily Beck

Updates 12.01.2010

Slate magazine has betrayed it’s usual far left, pro Obama posture and has come forth calling for Clintons’ scalp, if not her head on a platter. I tweeted that:

Altnewsforum CK Hunter If every diplomat who had ever spied, or knew of spying were to step down, there would most likely be few diplomats left at all. Kaput.


See also http://athensboy.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/wikileaks-hillary-clinton-and-the-smoking-gun/

TMI! Too much information. Coming to the end of “Wikileaks Monday” I am chuckling. Today was supposed to be “cyber-Monday” for internet holiday shopping, but for me it became cyber-Monday for absorbing the shock waves rolling through digital media about Julian Assange and his global document disclosure stunt. Glenn Beck weighed in with some VERY illuminating deep pockets within the far left wing connections behind Julian Assange, famously flailing in front of his chalkboard. Beck revealed the murky “connect the dots” chain of command leading to Julian, which runs the gamut from “Code Pink” all the way to “The Open Society Institute.” The video link is right here.

Meanwhile in New York, GOP congressman Peter King lifted eyelids when he asked Hillary Clinton to label Wikileaks as a “terrorist organization”. Wasn’t that a bit of an over-reaction? I may not agree with what Julian Assange  did, which appears more than anything to be a worldwide publicity stunt guaranteed to establish him as the ultimate “weberati rock star” of defying US presidents, in effect saying “fuck you” to the US federal government over the weekend by refusing to back down. Mrs. Clinton maintains that Assange stole these documents, and that is a serious charge indeed.

But when you begin legally attempting to redefine one man’s expression of US first amendment rights, [Assange is an Aussie ] and his action of  publishing factual documents on the web as a “terrorist organization,” then it begins to smack of those horrible ten warning signs of approaching fascism that Naomi Wolfe has warned us about. In essence the congressman was asking Mrs. Clinton to redefine freedom of speech online as a potential act of terror. This bothered me deeply.

If this was allowed to take place, then the legal precedent would be in place that any time an inconvenient truth is published anywhere about the US federal government and it’s activities, they would have the legal impetus and backing to go after the publisher as a terrorist organization. Gee, it seems like it was just last summer that the USA big media was calling ma and pa America, who dared to raise their voices in urgent town hall meetings, as “domestic terrorists.” It’s becoming rather a tired old ploy of the FED to try to silence dissent, or to plug holes in the international intelligence data stream when it ruptures.

There is a distinct vein of legal and fascist sounding creepiness here that keeps me writing to call attention to what just doesn’t “feel right.”  Why the next thing you know, they might be calling me out as a domestic terrorist just for writing about it. We are really not sure anymore just how low our own federal government will go. Trust is eroding away.

Celebrity politico Sarah Palin and Michelle Malkin, { I am a fan of both } both vehemently condemned what Julian did. But I wondered how they felt as the day wore on, and the press began reporting what the GOP congressman wanted Secretary of State Clinton to do. I also wondered how such sensitive materials could have been handled with such carelessness that a soldier in the intelligence dept. could datamine the whole lot of this stuff and then send it on. Is it possible this stuff was never that highly classified in the first place, as much as just deeply embarrassing to the Obama White House? I sense that Mrs. Clinton had the most to lose in it’s revelations.

How embarrassing are the WikiLeaks cables? A secret cable from April 2009 that went out under Clinton’s name instructed State Department officials to collect the “biometric data,” including “fingerprints, facial images, DNA, and iris scans,” of African leaders. Another secret cable directed American diplomats posted around the world, including the United Nations, to obtain passwords, personal encryption keys, credit card numbers, frequent flyer account numbers, and other data connected to diplomats. As the Guardian puts it, the cables “reveal how the US uses its embassies as part of a global espionage network.”
%d bloggers like this: